Skip to content

More Accurate Markers Identified for Detecting Response to Epigenetic Drugs for Myelodysplastic Syndromes

April 6, 2013
Bookmark and Share
  • The currently used marker has demonstrated inaccuracy.
  • Researchers identified and verified two biomarkers.
  • Findings could lead to a simple urine test to detect the effectiveness of epigenetic drug treatment.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Researchers have identified and validated two DNA methylation markers that could help physicians to more accurately determine a patient’s response to epigenetic drugs for treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), according to Xiaojing Yang, Ph.D., a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, who presented the data at the AACR Annual Meeting 2013, held in Washington, D.C., April 6-10.

“The current feedback from physicians is that they cannot tell if a patient is really getting the epigenetic drug they are being treated with or not, which makes it difficult for them to decide whether to stop treatment or increase the dosage of the drug,” said Yang. “This pushed us to think, why? Why didn’t the current marker work and should we try to seek a better one?”

These drugs, called DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTi), work by turning on genes that suppress cancer development, according to Yang. In patients with MDS, these genes are often silenced by the attachment of chemicals called methyl groups to the DNA backbone of the gene (an epigenetic modification made through a process called methylation), and DNMTi prevent methyl group attachment to DNA.

Currently, measuring methylation changes in DNA sequences known as LINE-1 elements is widely used as a predictor of whether or not DNMTi are working, but recent research has found that LINE-1 remethylation after a DNMTi is withdrawn occurs faster than in other regions. This implies that LINE-1 methylation changes may not reflect overall demethylation effects of DNMTi, according to Yang.

Yang and colleagues sought to find improved markers of DNA methylation status. Using the Infinium DNA methylation platform, they assessed the methylation profile of 27,000 genomic regions. The team tested this methylation profile on both normal and tumor bladder tissue samples and on white blood cells from healthy donors. They identified 1,429 regions that were consistently methylated in all three samples.

They then tested the methylation profile of these 1,429 regions in T24 bladder cancer and HL60 leukemia cell lines treated with a DNMTi for 24 hours. Of these, 79 significantly responded to demethylation treatment and remained demethylated beyond 30 days. Further analysis focused on the top two regions, which showed consistent hypermethylation in normal and tumor samples.

To verify their findings, Yang and colleagues studied the DNA demethylation levels of those two markers in urine samples from seven patients with MDS treated with the DNMTi azacitidine. They found that the two markers were significantly demethylated, in contrast to LINE-1 methylation, which showed no clear decreasing trend.

According to Yang, these findings could lead to the use of a simple urine test for detecting response to a DNMTi.

# # #

Press registration for the AACR Annual Meeting 2013 is free to qualified journalists and public information officers.

Follow the AACR on Twitter: @aacr #aacr
Follow the AACR on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/aacr.org

About the American Association for Cancer Research

Founded in 1907, the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) is the world’s first and largest professional organization dedicated to advancing cancer research and its mission to prevent and cure cancer. AACR membership includes more than 34,000 laboratory, translational and clinical researchers; population scientists; other health care professionals; and cancer advocates residing in more than 90 countries. The AACR marshals the full spectrum of expertise of the cancer community to accelerate progress in the prevention, biology, diagnosis and treatment of cancer by annually convening more than 20 conferences and educational workshops, the largest of which is the AACR Annual Meeting with more than 17,000 attendees. In addition, the AACR publishes eight peer-reviewed scientific journals and a magazine for cancer survivors, patients and their caregivers. The AACR funds meritorious research directly as well as in cooperation with numerous cancer organizations. As the scientific partner of Stand Up To Cancer, the AACR provides expert peer review, grants administration and scientific oversight of team science and individual grants in cancer research that have the potential for near-term patient benefit. The AACR actively communicates with legislators and policymakers about the value of cancer research and related biomedical science in saving lives from cancer. For more information about the AACR, visit www.AACR.org.

Media Contact:
Jeremy Moore
215) 446-7109
Jeremy.Moore@aacr.org
In Washington, D.C.,
April 6-10, 2013:

(202) 249-4005

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: